On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk> wrote:
> Read my second email in this thread--it's much slower. From the other
> thread I guess that's because it builds both shared and static
> libraries and I only want to build one.
I'm fixing that at the moment - right now, we're ignoring
--disable-shared/--disable-static.
> diff shows about 7000 lines
> changed so there could be other things as well. I suppose I could
> create my on modified version of the script, but why should I have to
> do that when Subversion used to do it automatically. How many of the
> 7000 changes matter?
Then it sounds like that isn't the same libtool that you were running
against before. The diffs should be relatively minor (mine is in the
order of 60 lines once you factor out the tags which is ~800 lines of
fortran and gcj support, etc, etc.). The fact it isn't likely means
you are confused about what version of libtool you are using. Are
your libtoolize and libtool the same version? IMO, this is all the
more reason that Subversion shouldn't be involved at all in this
process. -- justin
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1251289
Received on 2009-03-01 17:56:15 CET