[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.6.0-rc2 tarballs up for signing/testing

From: <kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:52:47 -0600

"Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote on 02/19/2009
01:09:23 PM:

> Good afternoon,
>
> After a flurry of activity to fix a couple of problems discovered in
> rc1, I'm pleased to announce that Subversion 1.6.0-rc2 "Swordfish" is
> up for testing and signing. The magic revision is r36015.
>
> http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.0-rc2/

My vote doesn't count, but "make check" passes with no failures
on Solaris 10 x86 built "mostly static" with the following
built static library deps:

ZLIB_VER := 1.2.3
OPENSSL_VER := 0.9.7m
OPENLDAP_VER := 2.4.10
SQLITE_VER := 3.6.11
APR_VER := 1.2.12
APRUTIL_VER := 1.2.12
NEON_VER := 0.28.3
SERF_VER := 0.3.0
SWIG_VER := 1.3.31

Summary of test results:
  24 tests SKIPPED
  26 tests XFAILED
(It'd be nice to summarize the number passed too, wouldn't it?)

How do most people do their combinational checks?
I.E. serf/neon/fsfs/bdb, etc.? (I'm assuming
"make check" isn't enough and I'd like to be
thorough on this "unique" platform...)

Kevin R.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1194674
Received on 2009-02-19 22:53:06 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.