On 22/01/2009, at 11.30, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:03, Jon Bendtsen <jbendtsen_at_laerdal.dk>
> wrote:
>> ...
>> But what if people wants more than module, branch, submodule and
>> file.
>> What about directory and subdir, ...
>>
>> Maybe we should add generic fields like
>> pf1, pf2, ... (Path Field 1, 2, ...)
>
> That is what I've been trying to describe. You can name each of the
> fields as corresponding to a particular path segment:
>
> headers_from_path = module/branch/submodule/directory/subdir/.../file
yes, but i wanted to add a twist. I didnt want to put the word 'branch'
in the header, i figured that a simple pfX could do it
>>>>> Because you defined the superclass to take that parameter. The
>>>>> MailedOutput.start() call is going to throw an exception because
>>>>> you
>>>>> don't pass the value.
>>>>
>>>> I didnt experience exceptions or other faults on the ~25.000
>>>> changes
>>>> we had in our subversion repository. I started the script by "hand"
>>>> to
>>>> a dummy email address, and there was nothing on stdout or stderr.
>>>
>>> The exception would be raised if you use the smtp_hostname
>>> configuration option. I suspect you maybe used the mail_command
>>> configuration instead? Or maybe left both blank and generated to
>>> stdout instead?
>>
>> i use mail_command. I can try using the smtp_hostname
>
> No need to try it. I know it will throw an exception. Just add that
> parameter like I pointed out, and it should work fine.
I still need to test that it works once i have added the parameter,
and for that i would like to see the change from before to after.
JonB
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1043021
Received on 2009-01-22 11:55:41 CET