[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r35262 - trunk/build/ac-macros

From: Jeremy Whitlock <jcscoobyrs_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:26:03 -0700

> Wasn't this known to cause problems?
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=17212

I wasn't aware of this.

> We need a comment in neon.m4, this change has been made and reverted
> multiple times already.

Okay. The biggest problem to me is that there appears to be a lack of
conformity. What do we (Subversion) do? We don't have a requirement
either way so it's hard to make a decision either way. How do you
think this should be handled? Which is more right? Requiring package
maintainers to deliver the .la files or having Subversion work with
the shared libraries when using --with-neon?

-- 
Take care,
Jeremy Whitlock
http://www.thoughtspark.org
Received on 2009-01-15 19:28:32 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.