On Dec 28, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> Grrr. Another attachment replaced by a copy of the message body.
>
> It's been a _month_. Do we need to get used to just appending patches
> to a message body directly? I'd be OK with that, but I understand
> some
> people use broken MUAs (gmail, perhaps?) that mangle whitespace when
> you do that.
> --
Is that right? I though MUAs mangle whitespace on in-line patches, and
appending them as attachments was the work-around? (Speaking strictly,
here, of how the originating user might handle the message.)
As mentioned in a separate thread, some improvements in this behavior
may be expected soon, but I'm not able to promise a complete fix any
time soon.
-==-
Jack Repenning
Chief Technology Officer
CollabNet, Inc.
8000 Marina Boulevard, Suite 600
Brisbane, California 94005
office: +1 650.228.2562
mobile: +1 408.835.8090
raindance: +1 877.326.2337, x844.7461
aim: jackrepenning
skype: jackrepenning
twitter: http://twitter.com/jrep
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1006386
Received on 2009-01-06 00:20:04 CET