Re: tree-conflicts: add-on-add with directories

Whoa, something's really weird. This last one I sent to the list and myself.
One of the mails *had* the file attached, the other had the message itself
copied into and replacing the attachment.

So did the list get the attachment? I guess not.

I'm pretty sure now that it's not my mailer that is wrong but that some
tigris mailing stuff is not working properly (probably related to the recent
update).

Before I cram this list with sending retries, just get the "attached" file
at: http://hofmeyr.de/svn/cd-into-conflicted3.sh.txt

~Neels

Neels Janosch Hofmeyr wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 01:16:29AM +0100, Neels Janosch Hofmeyr wrote:
>>> Hi tree-conflicts folks,
>>>
>>> I've just found out that we're not actually raising a tree-conflict upon an
>>> added-added conflict involving only a directory. It *is* reported on files
>>> when similarly named files are in the two added dirs.
>>>
>>> See attached reproduction script (which was aiming at testing whether such
>>> an add-add conflict on a dir was blocked when stepping into it).
>>>
>>> ~Neels
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=980960
>> Hey Neels,
>>
>> The attachment just contained your text again, not the script:
>
> Huh! How's that possible! The mailer must be buggy again.
> Trying again.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=980974
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=980978