On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 01:16:29AM +0100, Neels Janosch Hofmeyr wrote:
> Hi tree-conflicts folks,
>
> I've just found out that we're not actually raising a tree-conflict upon an
> added-added conflict involving only a directory. It *is* reported on files
> when similarly named files are in the two added dirs.
>
> See attached reproduction script (which was aiming at testing whether such
> an add-add conflict on a dir was blocked when stepping into it).
>
> ~Neels
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=980960
Hey Neels,
The attachment just contained your text again, not the script:
> Hi tree-conflicts folks,
>
> I've just found out that we're not actually raising a tree-conflict upon an
> added-added conflict involving only a directory. It *is* reported on files
> when similarly named files are in the two added dirs.
>
> See attached reproduction script (which was aiming at testing whether such
> an add-add conflict on a dir was blocked when stepping into it).
>
> ~Neels
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=980960
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=980968
Received on 2008-12-08 10:41:08 CET