Re: RFC: Untangling the peg revision knot

From: Branko Cibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:07:27 +0100

C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> If we estimate that there are something like 2 - 3 million Subversion
> users, what percentage of those appear (from our admittedly limited
> perspective) to be suffering from this syntax today?

All of 'em that I know. :-D
Ok, ok ... I give in.

-- Brane

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=598122
Received on 2008-12-02 18:07:53 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Rall: "Re: New mailing list software: [Fwd: svn commit: r34521 - in branches/1.5.x-reintegrate-improvements: . notes/tree-conflicts subversion/bindings/swig subversion/include/private subversion/libsvn_client subversion/libsvn_subr subversion/tests/cmdline"
Previous message: Hyrum K. Wright: "Re: svn commit: r34516 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs"
In reply to: C. Michael Pilato: "Re: RFC: Untangling the peg revision knot"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]