[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Why ra_serf should not (yet) be the default WebDAV RA implementation

From: Augie Fackler <durin42_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:45:52 -0600

On Nov 14, 2008, at 8:52 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:

> Until one of these is done, my vote is a very strong -1 on disabling
> Neon as
> the default WebDAV RA implementation. And, no, I am not signing up
> for
> either task, because ra_serf doesn't scratch my itch (it more often
> causes
> me grief, see below), the editor API works fine for my purposes, and
> my time
> is required by other things.

Beyond that, there are some servers that just plain *don't work* with
serf, mainly ones using a proxy like perlbal. The largest projects
I've seen this on are Django and Vim.

  • application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on 2008-11-14 20:14:34 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.