Re: svn commit: r34043 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:18:41 -0800

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com> wrote:
>...
> So, does the loggy/non-loggy usage look OK?

Sure. Would be nice to have a loggy run with larger scope, but that is
possible now with the __loggy_ form. Callers can use that to lump lots
of changes into one log accumulator.

Cheers,
-g

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-05 20:18:53 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Foad: "Re: [PATCH] Tree conflicts - revert and resolve per victim"
Previous message: Julian Foad: "Re: FAIL: five tests on trunk - now only two"
In reply to: Julian Foad: "Re: svn commit: r34043 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]