On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Jeremy Whitlock <jcscoobyrs_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Slick idea. After r33671 and r33707 I'm still having a bit of trouble with the
>> Ruby bindings. I think the issue is that SWIGWIN is defined empty when the
>> PLATFORM_SPECIFIC_WRAPPER macro is expanded by SWIG, so I ended up with a
>> #ifdef with no macro to test the definition of when trying to actually compile
>> the bindings.
>>
>> Attached is a patch that uses a new macro SVN_SWIG_WINDOWS that is not defined
>> when PLATFORM_SPECIFIC_WRAPPER is expanded, and then is defined later. Does
>> this sound reasonable? Is there a better name for the new macro? Is there a
>> better place for it to be defined?
>
> Thanks for the patch but I think it's a moot point. I'm currently
> refactoring the auth providers and it should be ready for commit
> tomorrow. For more details about the refactoring, please review the
> following thread:
>
> http://www.nabble.com/Configuring-encrypted-password-caching:-API-proposal-td20017581.html
>
Thanks for the link. I reread that thread and it sounds great to not
have to platform specific APIs exposed, but don't we have to support
the existing interfaces until 2.0? I look forward to your seeing
refactoring.
--
Joe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-04 16:22:48 CET