Re: Subversion Performance (was Re: fs-rep-sharing branch)

On Oct 22, 2008, at 7:21 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:

> Listman wrote:
>
>> if rep-sharing is a performance drain then please make it optional.
>>
>> Actually anything that is going to slow us should be optional (begin
>> "svn is slow" rant yet again..)
>
> Anyway, if people want to rip the rep-sharing stuff out, go ahead. If
> fsfs-packing should disappear, so be it. However, there is a
> substantial
> segment of our userbase who wants (and arguably needs) these types
> of features,
> just as there others who care about massive concurrency and server
> CPU usage.
> Let's not leave them hanging high-and-dry.

I'd like to see fsfs-packing. Our svn backend is going to be seeing
10 commits per second and fsck'ing a filesystem so many inodes after
many months of running is going to be painful.

Blair

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-23 17:52:40 CEST