[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: New HTTP Protocol (was re: svn commit: r33365)

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_red-bean.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 10:15:31 -0500

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> 1) Eliminate the need for 2 URL's. This is bad. With your Google
> code hosting do you really want to offer 2 URL's for all repositories?
> I am sure we do not want to do that at CollabNet and I doubt
> SourceForge and other sites want to either.
>
> 2) We do not have do a new implementation of DAV autoversioning.

Hm, maybe you're right. Even though it will make mod_dav_svn much
more complicated, perhaps it's worth the benefit of having only one
module, and having both protocols available at the same URL. As
discussed in the other thread, it would be really awkward to export
two different URLs for two different protocols.

Let me ponder this a bit, and see if I can evolve the designdoc such
that it assumes that it's building on top our existing mod_dav_svn
structure.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-01 17:15:48 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.