Re: fs-rep-sharing infinite loop (again)
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Vlad Georgescu wrote:
>> Can't we add a boolean flag to node-revision-id, set to TRUE if the node-rev-id
>> reused a rep?
> Nope, that's not quite right. A node-revision-id carries two different
> rep-keys (one for file contents, one for properties), and they are
> independently deltified. *BUT*. In the new forward-order world, we know
> three things:
> - the only representations that we should be deltifying are those for the
> most-recently-committed transaction.
> - we needn't bother deltifying representations that weren't created in
> that transaction (because if they weren't, they were created in some
> prior transaction and should already have been deltified)
> - the schema already preserves for us the transactions in which a rep
> was created.
> I'm almost finished with a patch that makes use of this knowledge right now.
Patch committed in r33259.
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2008-09-23 22:06:11 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev