Greg Stein wrote on Mon, 18 Aug 2008 at 06:00 -0700:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> >...
> > d) It will allow us to work on wc-ng without automatically including it
> > (in whatever shape it is then) in the next release.
>
> I'm with Branko: not to worried about this.
>
> The big question is whether this goes into 1.6 or not. On the roadmap,
> I see there is a hope to release 1.6 at the end of the year. I'm
> hoping to be done in time for that. But that's pretty aggressive. So
> the next question becomes: hold 1.6, or just include some dead code in
> 1.6? At some point, there will be a "no turning back" commit that puts
> the WC onto its new track. We'll have to discuss/judge at that point.
> *That* commit may start a branch so that it can route around a 1.6
> release.
>
Fair enough -- let's cross the bridge when we get to it. :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-18 15:31:12 CEST