Alright, here's the one with all callers updated.
[[[
* subversion/libsvn_repos/fs-wrap.c
(svn_repos_fs_lock): allow returned new_token from pre-lock hook.
* subversion/libsvn_repos/repos.h
(svn_repos__hooks_pre_lock): now has additional returned value for token.
* subversion/libsvn_repos/hooks.c
(run_hook_cmd): allow stdout of hook to be captured and returned.
Update all callers.
(svn_repos__hooks_pre_lock): get token from run_hook_cmd.
* subversion/libsvn_repos/repos.c: Document the pre-lock feature for
token from stdout.
]]]
2008/8/7 Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>:
> "Chia-liang Kao" <clkao_at_clkao.org> writes:
>> 2008/8/3 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta_at_gmail.com>:
>>> This is private function so no compatibility should be required.
>>
>> I guess it's mostly because i have another patch at the same time and
>> i didn't want to make them interdependent. Can I un-revision the
>> private function after they are both approved?
>
> I confess, I completely didn't understand this explanation... :-) Help?
> (Or just post a new version without the needless private API rev?)
>
> Thanks,
> -K
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-08 00:45:57 CEST