[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.5.1 up for signing/testing

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:32:22 -0400

David Glasser wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:10 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>>> It was just brought to my attention that I *should* have seen serf tests
>>>> failing.
>>> Can someone please remind me why those two serf tests aren't XFAIL?
>> Because the tests can't reliably know which of the two WebDAV modules is
>> being used?
>
> Sure it can; it can check svntest.main.http_library.
>
> Now, sure, you're only "required" to pass --http-library
> ($HTTP_LIBRARY) to the test suite if you've built with both libraries,
> but we can change that requirement. (Or it can just parse 'svn
> --version'.)

Right. So, no, it cannot reliably work today to simply mark those test as
XFAIL based on some readily-available conditional evaluation. But yes,
there are things we can do to our testing framework to make this possible.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2008-07-25 07:32:39 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.