Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:
> So Julian's approach to storing property conflicts data in the auth
> is consistent with what we have already done on the tree conflicts
> branch.
>
> While maintaining consistency between the way text conflicts and
> other types of conflicts are handled is certainly desirable, I don't
> think it's viable. The way we currently deal with text conflicts is fine.
> But it is also much simpler than how we want to deal with tree and property
> conflicts. And the way our current trunk code is dealing with either
> of those is, well, suboptimal.
*nod* Okay, that all sounds reasonable to me. (Assuming you mean
"admin area" where you write "auth area").
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-07-24 18:33:49 CEST