Re: merge very slow

Stefan Küng wrote:
> Seems I have to patch neon in my build to get the speed up to par with
> a VC6 build.
>
> Stefan

Oh men, the bottleneck on my system was not svn but my firewall on my
somewhat older server machine. I do use Kerio Winroute firewall with
some very safe, but apparently slow settings ;).

Now I have similar timings:

VC 2008, x64 release:
unpatched neon: 4:16
patched neon (As you wrote on svn dev list): 2:04

VC6 (rc9 from collab.net)
2:06

Thus, case more or less solved (congrats!), at least about the
differences between VC6 and VC2008.

With my very limited c knowledge I would say the pre-proc. directive is
not correct.

#if defined(TCP_NODELAY) && defined(HAVE_SETSOCKOPT) && defined(IPPROTO_TCP)

if stated like above even the VS syntax highlighting says that the
condition is false. If stated like:
#if defined(TCP_NODELAY) && defined(HAVE_SETSOCKOPT) //&&
defined(IPPROTO_TCP)

then its true (according to VS). So it seems that defined does not like
enum values directly. (But i guess you already know that ;))

Regards,
Jens

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-06-15 19:59:48 CEST