Re: SVN-DEV HELP NEEDED: What to do about the ra-get-log interface

"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> writes:
> For the purposes of the 1.5.0 release, I agree. I tightened that
> sloppy code up for a reason, and found a bunch of bugs as a result.
> I'd like *not* to loosen it up again just to cater to folks who happen
> to like the way one of our bugs pans out.
>
> Now, that our current RA model causes many operations that needn't
> fail to do so is another problem altogether. But for API consumers
> that have been well-behaved, that has always been true, so we can (if
> we so desire) address those matters in a future release.

Also, having empty 'paths' do one thing and NULL 'paths' do a different
thing would just be bad API design, IMHO. +1 on leaving it as-is in
1.5.0.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-06-04 00:33:54 CEST