On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:57 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> I assume you mean, "the drawback and penalty of using ra_neon today".
> ra_serf doesn't win here on any particular design merits -- it just
> implements a propfind cache of the same variety that ra_neon could (and
> should), too, right?
I don't think it'd be feasible to implement a similar cache at the
ra_neon layer as Neon hides too much of the underlying WebDAV
interactions to just plug in a true property cache. So, it'd only be
partially effective at best and be a nightmare to hook in, IMO. You'd
probably need to rewrite large chunks of neon to do it right. --
justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-28 22:05:51 CEST