your support is greatly appreciated! When I discovered the mentioned bug I
was definitely in a "Priority P2" state, so high impact in my case :-(
Current state is that I've coded around the problem. I don't have the
statistics to determine the probability for other to encounter the same
thing, but I think 'xml' often is perceived as the "safe and stable"
approach and creates more bad will when failing. For this reason I suggest a
I've looked at the enhanced issue list on your site and it looks good! Also
tried the search function at
http://subversion.tigris.org/project_issues.html (summary search) and it
works as well (not least important when the issue list grows).
2008/5/27 Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>:
> Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:
> >> However, the results page seems perfectly functional, and I counted that
> >> all 2850 issues were there.
> > Heh. I hope you didn't have to count by hand? :)
> Of course not. I asked Emacs to count for me :-).
Received on 2008-05-28 18:16:16 CEST