[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Re: Semantics of --depth: should define WC-depth for omitted-items?

From: Rui, Guo <timmyguo_at_mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:22:30 +0800

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:27:36PM +0530, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
> Hi Rui,
>
> Rui, Guo wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:37:01AM +0800, Rui, Guo wrote:
> >+def pull_in_tree_with_depth_option(sbox):
> >+ """pull in sub tree with with --depth=immediates, expecting to see the
> >depth
> >+ of the sub tree is set to immediates"""
>
> The test doc string should not exceed 50 characters. You can make it as
> "verify subtree with --depth=immediates".
>
> >+ wc_empty,ign_a, ign_b, ign_c = set_up_depthy_working_copies(sbox,
> >+ empty=True)
>
> Check formatting here.
>
> >+ expected_disk = svntest.wc.State('', {
> >+ 'A' : Item(),
> >+ 'A/mu' : Item("This is the file 'mu'.\n"),
> >+ 'A/B' : Item(),
> >+ 'A/C' : Item(),
> >+ 'A/D' : Item(),
>
> Check formatting here.
Sorry for the formating fault. I'll avoid the same mistake next time.
Thank you for figuring it out.
Rui, Guo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-18 11:44:03 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.