[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: SVN 1.5 and RC1

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:11:19 -0400

"Mark Phippard" <markphip_at_gmail.com> writes:
> I also saw some discussion last week about improving the format of the
> mergeinfo output before release. Is that still an open issue or did
> it get committed? When Dan and I were originally making proposals
> around this command we envisioned it having output that was similar to
> svn log. At the time, that was the main hold-up for us in
> implementing it as we could not decide if it should be a new
> subcommand or an option to log. I liked the proposals for the command
> line UI I saw last week, but would still like to see log style output.
> In the graphical merge client we have built, I use the API to show
> the revisions eligible to be merged and I do it in a log style format.
> It is extremely useful, especially when deciding what revisions ought
> to potentially be backported.

I think that discussion is still going on, but all the contenders have
been implemented (as far as I know), so it's just a question about
choosing what we want the output to look like.

> As an example, I have attached the output we produce in the client of
> some of our eligible revisions. We get 25 at a time, and I clicked
> the Get Next button a couple of times until I saw the date was prior
> to our recent releases. I am not proposing we follow this exact
> output, just that it can make it easy to see what you might want to
> merge when you can see it in log format. Someone might see some more
> stuff to propose for backport in this output too :)

I think that's roughly what one of the proposed verbose-ish outputs
looks like, yeah.

> Anyway, getting this back on topic. Are there any other blockers
> besides the one (maybe two) issues I noted above? Proposed backports
> notwithstanding of course.

Aside from that, I know of none. My in-progress changes to fix
libsvn_client/diff.c (to make diff_tests 47 pass, but the problem is
with Subversion, not with the test) are not 1.5 blockers, IMHO. I
should have them done today, and will propose them for backport, but
they don't need to hold anything up.

RC1 this week? :-) Hyrum?

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-03-25 17:11:32 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.