[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: What versions of SWIG? [was: 1.5.0-alpha1 tarballs up for testing/signing]

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:45:48 -0600

Joe Swatosh wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Eric Gillespie <epg_at_pretzelnet.org> wrote:
>>> "Joe Swatosh" <joe.swatosh_at_gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> I was watching that thread. kou's patch seemed to help you. I tried
>>> Not really: http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2008-01/0712.shtml
>>>
>>> Despite what I suggested there, I don't think it's a problem with
>>> my Ruby installation. I can build the 1.4 binding fine, and was
>>> able to reproduce the trunk failure with Dapper's ruby.
>>>
>>>> 1.3.27 today
>>>> on trunk and it built for me (but there were some test failures).
>>>> Looks like I'll have
>>>> to try a bunch of builds.....
>>> Hyrum says the swig files in the alpha tar file are from
>>> swig 1.3.33.
>>>
>> Good to know. There was another thread about 1.3.33 too. I
>> know that I can't build with that version, so I may be able to
>> help after all.
>>
>> What versions of SWIG are we supporting?
>>
>
> What versions of SWIG should work with 1.5?

alpha1 was rolled with 1.3.33, but that apparently had problems. I'm
planning on using 1.3.31 for alpha2, and to continue using it until
bindings maintainers can confirm that 1.3.33 works correctly. I don't
think we should consider the swig version "frozen" until we reach RC stage.

-Hyrum

Received on 2008-02-26 17:46:03 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.