Re: very close to 1.5.0-alpha1

"David Glasser" <glasser_at_davidglasser.net> writes:
> Honestly, stressing about the rev counting API seems irrelevant here,
> as it is dwarfed in importance by "log -g" itself. The real question
> should be if we should release an alpha where 'log -g' is "currently
> and completely broken", not whether or not we remove a trivial rev
> counting API.

Since reviewing (and probably porting) the 'log -g' changes is going
to happen as part of this, I didn't think to address that point -- but
yes, I agree that it's the more important question.

(Well, I sort of feel that APIs have a special sacredness, but the
practical effects of losing this one post-alpha1 would be nil, you're
quite right.)

-Kaqrl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-02-22 05:30:51 CET