Re: [PATCH] Really don't use DSO unless --enable-dso

From: Eric Gillespie <epg_at_google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:33:43 -0800

Max Bowsher <maxb1_at_ukf.net> writes:

> +1, but wouldn't SVN_USE_DSO imply APR_HAS_DSO? (and that constraint
> probably ought to be enforced in configure)

SVN_USE_DSO implies APR_HAS_DSO only if we write additional code
in the configure script to check it. Yours is a fine suggestion,
but autoconf is an abomination and I'm not digging any more
deeply than I have to.

All the other replies also seem to be nice-to-haves above and
beyond what I provided ;->. I don't disagree with any of them,
but I don't think they are reasons not to commit this. Please
correct me if I misread the replies.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-02-20 02:34:20 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Justin Erenkrantz: "Re: [PATCH] Really don't use DSO unless --enable-dso"
Previous message: Max Bowsher: "Re: [PATCH] Really don't use DSO unless --enable-dso"
In reply to: Max Bowsher: "Re: [PATCH] Really don't use DSO unless --enable-dso"
Next in thread: Justin Erenkrantz: "Re: [PATCH] Really don't use DSO unless --enable-dso"
Reply: Justin Erenkrantz: "Re: [PATCH] Really don't use DSO unless --enable-dso"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]