On Jan 30, 2008, at 3:12 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Augie Fackler wrote:
>> Ah, that information comes from the RA layer (I was just trying to
>> figure this out) - I'll go inspect them all and make sure they DTRT
>> for this case. Should I keep the original part of the patch and
>> include it with the work on the RA layer?
>
> We shouldn't need the original patch, but I won't complain if we
> include that code. Should make us more resilient in the case of
> some other unseen programmer error.
Acutally, in looking more - it's a bug in libsvn_ra_serf anyway. If I
switch my RA layer to neon and re-run the checkout without my patch,
it works. I'm working on a fix for serf now.
> --
> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On
> Demand
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-01-30 22:17:49 CET