[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: svn commit: r28942 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_client tests/cmdline

From: Paul Burba <pburba_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:28:38 -0800

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dglasser_at_gmail.com [mailto:dglasser_at_gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of David Glasser
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 6:25 PM
> To: dev_at_subversion.tigris.org; pburba_at_tigris.org
> Cc: svn_at_subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r28942 - in trunk/subversion:
> include libsvn_client tests/cmdline
>
> On Jan 16, 2008 2:26 PM, <pburba_at_tigris.org> wrote:
> > @@ -223,6 +224,13 @@
> >
> > SVN_ERR(svn_wc_entry(&entry, wcpath, adm_access, FALSE,
> > pool));
> >
> > + /* Look in WCPATH's parents only if the parents
> share the same
> > + working revision. */
> > + if (entry->revision != base_revision)
> > + {
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
>
> Can this be safely relaxed to
>
> if (base_revision < entry->cmt_rev || entry->revision < base_revision)
> break;
>
> ?

I've thought about this a lot (too much), *certain* there was a
problem...but I think I'm mistaken ;-)

Once I phrase your suggestion this way, I can't find any problem with
it:

"Given a child path and it's immediate parent path, if
parent_committed_rev <= child_working_rev <= parent_working_rev, then
child can safely inherit from parent"

However, does this gain us anything? I can't come up with one example
where this change would correctly allow inheritance where it disallows
it right now. IOW, it doesn't appear to get us out of the "update your
merge target tree before merging" situation that exists right now. And
if there is a situation where it does help, I dread trying to write the
docs describing it, we'll probably just say "update your target WC
before merging" anyway (assuming some form of mixed-rev WC restriction
ultimately stays of course, no certain thing).

Of course my brain is also wrapped in inheritance knots so maybe I'm not
seeing something obvious...anyhow if I can't come up with a
counter-example tonight I'll make the change.

> (Also, stylistically, we usually don't have the braces here, I think.

Fixed that.

> --dave
>
> --
> David Glasser | glasser_at_davidglasser.net |
> http://www.davidglasser.net/
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-01-26 01:29:03 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.