David Glasser wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 6:40 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh_at_collab.net> wrote:
>
>> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>
>>> Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
>>>
>>>> With this I tend to think we need to do 3 things,
>>>>
>>>> 1)In trunk Make 'get_mergeinfo_for_tree' API to be sqlite independent.
>>>>
>>>> 2)In issue-2897 branch make 'get_commit_and_merge_ranges' extract
>>>> data from fs rather than from sqlite.
>>>>
>>> 2b) Implement all the other mergeinfo queries for BDB, too.
>>>
>> Thanks for clarifying that, I am working on implementing 2) right now.
>>
>
> That's good to hear. What is your design for doing this efficiently?
>
> The design I've been imagining involves adding a field to noderevs
> "predecessor-where-mergeinfo-changed" or something.
>
I don't have any design yet.
I am still making an effort to understand your work on
'sqlite-mergeinfo-without-mergeinfo'. Will make a proposal or patch if
it is simple soon.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-01-24 17:14:21 CET