On Jan 10, 2008 5:46 PM, Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com> wrote:
> "David Glasser" <glasser_at_davidglasser.net> writes:
> > (There's no reason not to include both features, by the way; they're
> > orthogonal. I just don't want to include issue-2897 at all unless
> > several people have been convinced that it actually works well.)
>
> David said exactly what I would have said.
>
> The issue-2897 stuff will be very useful, but it is *not* necessary
> for maintaining and merging back feature branches. The --reintegrate
> thang will take care of the common case there.
OK, I misunderstood the difference between the 'reintegrate' branch
and the 2897 branch.
It seems like the reintegrate branch at least makes it easy an
automatic for users to manage and re-merge feature branches (assuming
they treat their branch reasonably.) That's all I care about for svn
1.5. It sounds like Kamesh's branch is a much fancier (and more
complex) generalization of this problem, so I'm fine with putting that
off till svn 1.6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-01-10 22:43:02 CET