[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Issue 2897 revisited. Really.

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-11-29 16:11:28 CET

On Nov 29, 2007 10:10 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh@collab.net> wrote:
>
> > Ah, right, so Ph.Marek's suggestion won't work for cherry-picking. So
> > you'll have to investigate one of the other two methods: either
> > subtract r51 from r60 and merge the resulting patch back to trunk, or
> > force r60 to be split into r60 and r61 when the user does the
> > cherrypicking.
> >
>
> Forcing the commit to fail if it has some local mod along with merge
> could be easy I think, though I would prefer having something like
> non-reflective merge editor, which I am investigating.

I do not think anyone is suggesting you could not do the commit. Just
that commit would somehow "magically" perform two commits instead of
one. I honestly do not see how that is possible, but that is the
suggestion.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 29 16:11:41 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.