Re: fsfs recover and missing revprop

On Nov 26, 2007 9:06 PM, Jeremy Whitlock <jcscoobyrs@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> As I started looking into this, I have come across a need for more
> information. Since this enhancement will do nothing more than verify
> an FSFS repository and return an error if the problematic state is
> available, should this really be part of "svnadmin recover"? Nothing
> is really being recovered and no real work is being done other than
> the verification. I am not saying that "svnadmin recover" shouldn't
> notify the user if this problematic state arises but the "work"
> shouldn't be isolated to "svnadmin recover" and should probably be
> used by a few other svnadmin subcommands. Thoughts?

You seemed to have some very specific ideas when you posted this
earlier in the month:

http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=131985

I would suggest you stick with that and keep it in svnadmin recover.
If it turns out it could be used elsewhere later the code can always
be refactored. Right now, we just have this specific need, so let's
keep it simple.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org