On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, David Glasser wrote:
> > > On Nov 19, 2007 4:59 PM, Dan Christian <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > > Argh! Not this again. openssl has similar problems (under serf).
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 19, 2007 1:46 PM, David Glasser <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > > > Apparently SQLite requires you to compile it with -DSQLITE_THREADSAFE
> > > > > to be at all threadsafe. (There's a way to check at runtime
> > > > > (sqlite3_threadsafe()) if this is so, but that's an experimental API
> > > > > that may vanish.)
> > > > > Should we add something to INSTALL telling people they must build
> > > > > against a threadsafe SQLite if they are going to be using a thready
> > > > > server?
I added some text in r27963. For simplicity's sake, I went ahead and
stated that we require SQLite to be built in thread-safe mode, leaving
off the part about thready servers.
Received on Wed Nov 21 18:56:51 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored