Re: Improve svnsync performance over ra_serf.

"David Glasser" <glasser@davidglasser.net> writes:
> I would lean towards adding a new command. If people agree I'm happy
> to do the coding.

+1

> I'll point out that since the fallback here is just equivalent to "run
> svn_ra_replay" a bunch of times, and that's what ra_local and ra_neon
> need to do also, it might be a good idea to stick a project-private
> function in the ra-loader which simulates svn_ra_replay_range in terms
> of svn_ra_replay.

That sounds like a good idea -- there's no point replicating this
logic all over the place.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Nov 3 19:37:22 2007