Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> I don't think it's a deliberate thing, nor would it be hard to do.
> But you haven't told us why we should bother. :). Are we violating
> some spec?
>
Not in this regard. More just not taking advantage of all the details
of the spec that is there. I will check back with my co-workers to
understand the use-case more fully, and if he thinks it still relevant,
I'll file a bug.
Thanks for your feedback.
-Eric.
>
> On 10/26/07, Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> wrote:
>
>> I asked this question over on the user list, and got directed here.
>>
>> This is certainly a minor issue, if it even is one.
>>
>> My company has Subversion set up using Apache. If I use an HTTP GET on a
>> file, there is no Content-MD5 header in the response, even though using
>> the command-line cadaver client, I can do a "propget" request on the
>> file, and there is a md5-checksum property for that same resource. It
>> seems to me that if the data is available, SVN ought to provide it, but
>> maybe this is difficult to do?
>>
>> Should I file an issue for this? Is this by design?
>>
>> -Eric.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>>
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 29 19:19:21 2007