Daniel L. Rall wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, email@example.com wrote:
>> Author: kameshj
>> Date: Mon Oct 29 06:02:21 2007
>> New Revision: 27455
>> Code refactor.
>> * subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c
>> (svn_client_merge_peg3): Assign iteration independent 'merge_cmd_baton'
>> members out of iteration loop.
>> Call do_merge with FALSE for 'three way merge' rather than indirectly via
> This is inscrutable -- FALSE what?
I think he means, "Pass FALSE as the value of the three_way_merge parameter
of do_merge() instead of consulting the merge_cmd_baton", rather the way the
>> @@ -4663,7 +4669,7 @@
>> - merge_cmd_baton.target_missing_child,
>> + FALSE,
C. Michael Pilato <firstname.lastname@example.org>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on Mon Oct 29 19:01:27 2007