On 10/13/2007 12:12 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Oct 13, 2007 12:55 AM, Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com> wrote:
>> How about: "anything you would have formerly attached to an issue as a
>> patch", for starters? Now we can just say a revision number instead.
>
> But, then, it's impossible to review it via email because we don't have diffs.
>
> All I'm suggesting is that we turn back on diffs and socially tell
> folks, "don't be a turd" about giving nit-pick comments to anything in
> /checkpoints. Yet, if the intent of /checkpoints is that
> occassionally folks will be asked to look in it, then that implies we
> need easy ways to review what is there. -- justin
If I'm understanding, /checkpoints is essentially a centralized,
versioned working copy. So you really don't want diffs internal to a
checkpoint.
If the diffs don't show up again when you merge a checkpoint into trunk,
then that's the bug that needs fixing.
Jay Levitt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 13 20:36:11 2007