On Oct 4, 2007, at 7:09 PM, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Hm, I guess I disagree. 'svn patch' doesn't feel like a such a huge
> feature to me that it's worth holding back. If were half-implemented,
> sure, we wouldn't want to wait on it. But it's basically finished...
> it just needs some testing now, and I think it will (frankly) get a
> heck of a lot more testers attracted to it than merge-tracking.
> (Mainly because it's a much simpler, much more accessible new
> feature.)
These suspicions about their relative testability are probably
sound. 'Course, if we already *had* merge tracking, then we'd be
just that much less concerned about merging the patch branch back in!
-==-
Jack Repenning
Chief Technology Officer
CollabNet, Inc.
8000 Marina Boulevard, Suite 600
Brisbane, California 94005
office: +1 650.228.2562
mobile: +1 408.835.8090
raindance: +1 877.326.2337, x844.7461
aim: jackrepenning
skype: jrepenning
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 5 18:29:34 2007