On Wed, 03 Oct 2007, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
>
> >>NOTE: The above command does not accept a revision range.
> >>
> >>I would like to confirm whether this is a bug before I can file a issue
> >>for this in s.t.o
> >>
> >
> >I cannot envision what it ought to do with the -r argument. Is this a
> >case of all subcommands getting the -r argument automatically unless
> >they do something specific to reject it?
> >
> >
>
> We may not need -rstart:end but we may need it for one revision. Just to
> see what was the mergeinfo on {2007-10-03}.
Yup, we -r -- or need something like it -- to support a peg revision
for the 'mergeinfo' command.
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Wed Oct 3 19:21:37 2007