On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Eric Gillespie wrote:
> "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:
>
> > > IMHO supporting the use of both -r and -c at the same time would also b=
> > e
> > > nice since it allows a user to cherry pick changesets in the most
> > > concise way...=20
> > >=20
> > > svn merge -c4,-6 -r7:12,22:19
>
> I like that, +1
I like that too, +1.
> > I like the idea of being able to specify multiple ranges on the
> > command-line. I just wonder if we shouldn't adhere to previously
> > established conventions that allow for multiple instances of the same opt=
> > ion
> > rather than add a new comma-delimited syntax:
> >
> > svn merge -c4 -c8 -c9 -c10
>
> I agree with Ben and Mike though: don't bother with the commas.
I'm fine with either syntax.
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Thu Sep 27 01:46:59 2007