[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

SWIG versions - why not 1.3.31 yet?

From: Max Bowsher <maxb1_at_ukf.net>
Date: 2007-09-26 23:18:47 CEST

Does anyone know why our SWIG upper bound is still set at 1.3.29? Is
there any reason not to increase to 1.3.31?

Meanwhile, should we be taking this opportunity to increase the lower
bound? I don't imagine anyone's making a habit of testing new binding
development across the entire range, and I seem to remember SWIG 1.3.24
-> .25 being a significant change.

Max.

application/pgp-signature attachment: OpenPGP digital signature

Received on Wed Sep 26 23:19:36 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Max Bowsher: "Re: SWIG versions - why not 1.3.31 yet?"
Previous message: Eric Hanchrow: "Re: after configuring with --enable-all-static, many undefined references when linking"
Next in thread: Max Bowsher: "Re: SWIG versions - why not 1.3.31 yet?"
Reply: Max Bowsher: "Re: SWIG versions - why not 1.3.31 yet?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.