Re: Bindings question: do keyword args make us name-sensitive?

On 9/11/07, Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com> wrote:
> "Sage La Torra" <sagelt@gmail.com> writes:
> > I'll have to look into this, but as far as I know, ctypes does not
> > support automatically making keyword arguments. At present the
> > high-level classes built to make the binding extra nice do have
> > keyword arguments, but they are human generated.
>
> It sounds like the answer is: we probably shouldn't do this again, but
> it was okay to do it this time, since it happens that no bindings
> actually autogenerate keyword arguments yet.
>

Sounds right to me. I checked, and Ctypes does not automatically make
use of the argument names in any way (so far as I can tell), so no
problems there.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 12 06:14:41 2007