[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: git log vs. svn log

From: Charles Acknin <charlesacknin_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-09-06 16:13:39 CEST

On 9/5/07, Heikki Orsila <shd@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> wrote:
> Filed the issue.

I think 'svn diff' is a more (the most?) appropriate sub-command to
display the diffstat stuff, rather than 'svn log'.

As for "2. git log -p shows commit patches", I'm not sure whether it
would be most relevant in 'svn diff' or 'svn log' as it displays both
unidiffs and commit metadata, but I'm leaning towards 'svn diff' since
(a) the output is mostly made of unidiffs (b) the intent is to display
a patch, as git-log(1) says (and as it looks like).

(Note: I'm willing to contribute to this task :-)

Cheers,
Charles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 6 16:10:33 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.