Re: git log vs. svn log

On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 04:36:23PM +0100, Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:40:03PM +0300, Heikki Orsila wrote:
> > $ git log -p
> >
> > commit 795688a4905257516886cac6f3add6ba467dfe0b
> > Author: Heikki Orsila <shd@thingol.localdomain>
> > Date: Wed Aug 22 23:42:24 2007 +0300
> >
> > Add documentation of -i and -o [DOCUMENTATION]
> >
> > diff --git a/pmr.1 b/pmr.1
> > index f42235a..d3fd6d2 100644
> > --- a/pmr.1
> > +++ b/pmr.1
> > @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
> > -.TH pmr 1 "2006-11-03" Linux "user commands"
> > +.TH pmr 1 "2007-08-22" Linux "user commands"
> > ...
> >
>
> I must admit, I'd find this useful as well.

--stat is useful because I don't want to write names of the
affected files into the changelog message.. Many people waste effort in
writing those names, but the version control tool could
automagically do that.. And diffstat even shows how many lines changed..

-- 
Heikki Orsila			Barbie's law:
heikki.orsila@iki.fi		"Math is hard, let's go shopping!"
http://www.iki.fi/shd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org