Re: svn commit: r26129 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr

>>> -#define human_timestamp_format_suffix _(" (%a, %d %b %Y)")
>>> +#define human_timestamp_format_suffix " (%a, %d %b %Y)"
>>
>> I'm wondering whether I was right to remove this _() for this string
>> as an "obvious bug", or whether I missed the whole point?
>
> This string was translatable. Please revert r26129.
> In some languages the order of date parts is different than %d %b %Y.

Argh. Done in r26156.

I tried to improve the translation comment slightly so that other
translators may not miss the point as I have.

Browsing through strftime documentation, maybe "%x" (preferred date
representation in locale) could have been an option, although not
abbreviated.

Sorry for the flip-flop.

-- 
Fabien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org