[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: ra_serf violating editor API restrictions

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2007-08-10 00:24:11 CEST

On 8/9/07, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:

> I don't think we should cavalierly disregard the API rules in
> this fashion, even if there are performance benefits to be had. And I
> suspect that we could still be getting most of these performance benefits
> anyway without violating the editor rules.
>
> But what do others think? Where do we go from here?

I'm curious: software matures over time. Maybe we should change the
rules? I mean, are the rules actually hindering us more than helping
us? Do we have any editors that truly depend on depth-first?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 10 00:22:17 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.