Re: svn:ignore version controlled resource

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> To answer Mike Pilato's question directly, I think the definition of
> "ignoring a versioned file" is:
>
> "receives updates as usual, but is never committed (unless listed as
> an explicit target)."

That's a somewhat arbitrary definition of "ignore", which I reject outright
because I'm in a mood to do so. :-)

And as for explicit listing being the toggle for "okay to commit", as I
point out in issue #2858, that only works for command-line users --
TortoiseSVN *always* explicitly lists *every* committed thing.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand