Re: Making -l a shortcut for --limit (again)

On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 19:45 -0700, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Hmm, I don't think "important" vs "mundane" is the issue here. The
> issue is that "-l" is a very valuable piece of the option space, being
> a lower-case letter. As useful as --limit is, I'm not sure we should
> use up "-l" on it, especially since "-L" is still available.

My main concern is that --limit is only used with one subcommand, and I
think most of our single-letter options are used with several commands.
Though -u and -x are exceptions, and I guess it would be pretty painful
if they weren't.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 25 21:52:05 2007