Re: conflict callback API

On 6/28/07, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:

> > I like the concept, but in addition to putting a "path" into the
> > svn_client_conflict_description_t, I'd recommend putting an "adm_access"
> > baton. Otherwise, won't callback implementers will be lacking a vital tool
> > for working copy manipulation?

Ah, great idea. That's a vital tool, indeed.

>
> Ooh. Another thought. If Jeremy is still working on the
> automatically-resolve-conflicts-this-way-or-that code, would it make the
> most sense to do so as an implementation of this conflict resolution API?

Yes, I've been trying to express that idea for the last few weeks. :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 28 16:21:37 2007